
Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs PRO A6-8570E

Core 2 Duo SU9400

PRO A6-8570E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo SU9400 is positioned at rank 409 and the PRO A6-8570E is on rank 570, so the Core 2 Duo SU9400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SU9400
Performance Per Dollar PRO A6-8570E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo SU9400 | PRO A6-8570E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo SU9400 | PRO A6-8570E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SU9400 and PRO A6-8570E

Core 2 Duo SU9400
The Core 2 Duo SU9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,596 points. Launch price was $262.

PRO A6-8570E
The PRO A6-8570E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,606 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo SU9400 and PRO A6-8570E share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU9400 versus 3.4 GHz on the PRO A6-8570E — a 83.3% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8570E (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SU9400 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the PRO A6-8570E uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU9400 scores 1,596 against the PRO A6-8570E's 1,606 — a 0.6% lead for the PRO A6-8570E.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU9400 | PRO A6-8570E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz+143% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3 GHz+114% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | — |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1024 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 1,596 | 1,606 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo SU9400 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the PRO A6-8570E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU9400 | PRO A6-8570E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















