Core 2 Duo T5550
VS
Core i3-2310E

Core 2 Duo T5550 vs Core i3-2310E

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5550

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i3-2310E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T5550 is positioned at rank 23 and the Core i3-2310E is on rank 1130, so the Core 2 Duo T5550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5550

#11
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
161%
#12
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
158%
#13
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
145%
#14
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
145%
#15
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
143%
#17
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
138%
#18
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
133%
#19
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
133%
#20
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
129%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
100%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
100%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
96%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
95%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
94%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
94%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
93%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
93%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
91%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2310E

#1118
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3578%
#1119
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3526%
#1120
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3237%
#1121
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3222%
#1122
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3192%
#1124
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3083%
#1125
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2956%
#1126
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2951%
#1127
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2872%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
100%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
93%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-2310E delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo T5550 in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5550Core i3-2310E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core 2 Duo T5550 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $20), it costs 75% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 296% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i3-2310E.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5550Core i3-2310E
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+296%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i3-2310E

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5550

The Core 2 Duo T5550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,826 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i3-2310E

The Core i3-2310E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,845 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T5550 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2310E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5550 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-2310E — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-2310E (base: 1.83 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T5550 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-2310E uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5550 scores 1,826 against the Core i3-2310E's 1,845 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-2310E. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5550 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2310E.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5550Core i3-2310E
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.83 GHz
2.1 GHz+15%
Base Clock
1.83 GHz
2.1 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,826
1,845+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T5550 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2310E uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5550Core i3-2310E
Socket
PGA478
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo T5550) / true (Core i3-2310E). The Core i3-2310E includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo T5550 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2310E rivals Core i3-2330M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5550Core i3-2310E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($5 vs $20), the Core 2 Duo T5550 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T5550 delivers 365.2 pts/$ vs 92.3 pts/$ for the Core i3-2310E — making the Core 2 Duo T5550 the 119.3% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5550Core i3-2310E
MSRP
$225
Avg Price (30d)
$5-75%
$20
Performance per Dollar
365.2+296%
92.3
Release Date
2008
2011