Core 2 Duo T5550 vs Pentium M 765

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo T5550 vs Pentium M 765 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo T5550 vs Pentium M 765: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo T5550

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 21W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,826 vs 1,834).

Pentium M 765

2004

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌950% higher power demand at 21W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 765 better than Core 2 Duo T5550?

Yes. Pentium M 765 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 765 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 765 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 765 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 765 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo T5550 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo T5550 vs Pentium M 765 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T5550

The Core 2 Duo T5550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,826 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium M 765

The Pentium M 765 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,834 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T5550 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 765 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Duo T5550 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5550 versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium M 765 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Pentium M 765 (base: 1.83 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T5550 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium M 765 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5550 scores 1,826 against the Pentium M 765's 1,834 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium M 765. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5550 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 765.

Feature	Core 2 Duo T5550	Pentium M 765
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2.1 GHz+15%
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	2.1 GHz+15%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,826	1,834