Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Phenom II X4 B93

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5850

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 B93

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Phenom II X4 B93 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Phenom II X4 B93 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Phenom II X4 B93: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo T5850

2008

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Phenom II X4 B93

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo T5850 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (2,159 vs 2,161).
    • 4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core 2 Duo T5850 better than Phenom II X4 B93?
    Yes. Core 2 Duo T5850 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo T5850 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core 2 Duo T5850 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T5850 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Phenom II X4 B93 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Phenom II X4 B93 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core 2 Duo T5850

    The Core 2 Duo T5850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,161 points. Launch price was $249.

    AMD

    Phenom II X4 B93

    The Phenom II X4 B93 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,159 points. Launch price was $149.

    Processing Power

    The Core 2 Duo T5850 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 B93 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 B93 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5850 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 B93 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 B93. The Core 2 Duo T5850 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Phenom II X4 B93 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5850 scores 2,161 against the Phenom II X4 B93's 2,159 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5850.

    FeatureCore 2 Duo T5850Phenom II X4 B93
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    4 / 4+100%
    Boost Clock
    2.1 GHz
    2.8 GHz+33%
    Base Clock
    2.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    6 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2 MB+300%
    512 kB (per core)
    Process
    65 nm
    45 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Merom (2006−2008)
    Deneb (2009−2011)
    PassMark
    2,161
    2,159