A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo T5850

A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo T5850 Performance Spectrum

A10-5750M

4 / 4

2,174

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T5850

2 / 2

2,161

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo T5850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo T5850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5750M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650G, while Core 2 Duo T5850 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5850

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,161 vs 2,174).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5750M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5750M better than Core 2 Duo T5850?

Yes. A10-5750M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5750M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5750M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5750M still makes the most sense overall. A10-5750M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5750M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo T5850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo T5850

The Core 2 Duo T5850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,161 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5750M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5850 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5850 — a 50% clock advantage for the A10-5750M. The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5850 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Core 2 Duo T5850's 2,161 — a 0.6% lead for the A10-5750M.

Feature	A10-5750M	Core 2 Duo T5850
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+67%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	2,174	2,161
Geekbench 6 Single	320	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5750M) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5850). The A10-5750M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650G), while the Core 2 Duo T5850 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.