A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo T5850

CPU

GPU

A10-5750M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Core 2 Duo T5850

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

A10-5750M

4 / 4

2,174

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T5850

2 / 2

2,161

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-5750M is positioned at rank 1227 and the Core 2 Duo T5850 is on rank 245, so the Core 2 Duo T5850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5750M

#1215

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

7428%

#1216

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

7319%

#1217

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

6719%

#1218

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

6689%

#1219

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

6627%

#1221

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

6400%

#1222

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

6137%

#1223

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

6127%

#1224

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

5962%

#1227

A10-5750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1228

Core i7-620UM

MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A

99%

#1230

Celeron 570

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

95%

#1231

Core i7-820QM

MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A

84%

#1233

Core Duo T2700

MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A

71%

#1235

Pentium SU4100

MSRP: $289|Avg: $15

60%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

54%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

52%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

51%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

47%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

43%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5850

#64

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

100%

#233

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

407%

#234

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

401%

#235

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

368%

#236

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

367%

#237

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

363%

#239

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

351%

#240

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

337%

#241

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

336%

#242

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

327%

#245

Core 2 Duo T5850

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A10-5750M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo T5850 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	A10-5750M	Core 2 Duo T5850
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	A10-5750M	Core 2 Duo T5850
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

A10-5750M Benchmark Check

Core 2 Duo T5850 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-5750M and Core 2 Duo T5850

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo T5850

The Core 2 Duo T5850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,161 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5750M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5850 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5850 — a 50% clock advantage for the A10-5750M. The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5850 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Core 2 Duo T5850's 2,161 — a 0.6% lead for the A10-5750M.

Feature	A10-5750M	Core 2 Duo T5850
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+67%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	2,174	2,161
Geekbench 6 Single	320	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5750M) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5850). The A10-5750M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650G), while the Core 2 Duo T5850 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.