A10-5750M vs Core m3-6Y30

A10-5750M vs Core m3-6Y30 Performance Spectrum

A10-5750M

4 / 4

2,174

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core m3-6Y30

2 / 4

2,180

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5750M vs Core m3-6Y30 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5750M vs Core m3-6Y30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5750M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650G, while Core m3-6Y30 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,174 vs 2,180).

Core m3-6Y30

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while A10-5750M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5750M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-6Y30 better than A10-5750M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5750M is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-6Y30 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-6Y30 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-6Y30 is the better buy right now. Core m3-6Y30 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10-5750M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m3-6Y30 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5750M vs Core m3-6Y30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Core m3-6Y30

The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5750M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m3-6Y30 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 2.2 GHz on the Core m3-6Y30 — a 45.6% clock advantage for the A10-5750M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 0.9 GHz). The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Core m3-6Y30's 2,180 — a 0.3% lead for the Core m3-6Y30. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5750M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m3-6Y30.

Feature	A10-5750M	Core m3-6Y30
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+178%	0.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,174	2,180
Geekbench 6 Single	320	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5750M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5750M	Core m3-6Y30
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5750M) / not specified (Core m3-6Y30). The A10-5750M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650G), while the Core m3-6Y30 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.