A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo P7370

A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo P7370 Performance Spectrum

A10-5750M

4 / 4

2,174

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo P7370

2 / 2

2,191

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo P7370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo P7370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5750M

2013

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650G, while Core 2 Duo P7370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,174 vs 2,191).
❌1066.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P7370

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 35W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5750M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo P7370 better than A10-5750M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5750M is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo P7370 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo P7370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5750M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5750M vs Core 2 Duo P7370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5750M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the A10-5750M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Core 2 Duo P7370's 2,191 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7370. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5750M vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370.

Feature	A10-5750M	Core 2 Duo P7370
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+75%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	3 MB+200%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,174	2,191
Geekbench 6 Single	320	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5750M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5750M versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — the A10-5750M supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5750M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A76M (A10-5750M) and Mobile (Core 2 Duo P7370).

Feature	A10-5750M	Core 2 Duo P7370
Socket	FS1r2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+75%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-5750M) vs false (Core 2 Duo P7370). The A10-5750M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650G), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.