A10-5750M vs Athlon II X4 630

A10-5750M vs Athlon II X4 630 Performance Spectrum

A10-5750M

4 / 4

2,174

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X4 630

4 / 4

2,175

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5750M vs Athlon II X4 630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5750M vs Athlon II X4 630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5750M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650G, while Athlon II X4 630 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,174 vs 2,175).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.

Athlon II X4 630

2009

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A10-5750M.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while A10-5750M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5750M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5750M better than Athlon II X4 630?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5750M is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 630 pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 630 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5750M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-5750M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X4 630 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5750M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5750M vs Athlon II X4 630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II X4 630

The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-5750M and Athlon II X4 630 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A10-5750M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X4 630 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Athlon II X4 630's 2,175 — a 0% lead for the Athlon II X4 630. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A10-5750M	Athlon II X4 630
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,174	2,175
Geekbench 6 Single	320	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5750M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 630 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5750M versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 630 — the A10-5750M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5750M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A76M (A10-5750M) and Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 630).

Feature	A10-5750M	Athlon II X4 630
Socket	FS1r2	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A10-5750M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650G), while the Athlon II X4 630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.