A10-5750M vs Atom x7211RE

CPU

GPU

A10-5750M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Atom x7211RE

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

A10-5750M

4 / 4

2,174

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom x7211RE

2 / 2

2,188

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-5750M is positioned at rank 1227 and the Atom x7211RE is on rank 515, so the Atom x7211RE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5750M

#1215

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

7428%

#1216

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

7319%

#1217

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

6719%

#1218

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

6689%

#1219

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

6627%

#1221

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

6400%

#1222

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

6137%

#1223

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

6127%

#1224

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

5962%

#1227

A10-5750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1228

Core i7-620UM

MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A

99%

#1230

Celeron 570

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

95%

#1231

Core i7-820QM

MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A

84%

#1233

Core Duo T2700

MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A

71%

#1235

Pentium SU4100

MSRP: $289|Avg: $15

60%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

54%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

52%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

51%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

47%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

43%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211RE

#162

Core Ultra 7 256V

MSRP: $450|Avg: $350

99%

#503

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

670%

#504

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

661%

#505

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

606%

#506

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

604%

#507

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

598%

#509

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

578%

#510

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

554%

#511

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

553%

#512

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

538%

#515

Atom x7211RE

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7211RE (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	A10-5750M	Atom x7211RE
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)	✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-5750M (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	A10-5750M	Atom x7211RE
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

A10-5750M Benchmark Check

Atom x7211RE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-5750M and Atom x7211RE

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5750M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7211RE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE — a 9% clock advantage for the A10-5750M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1 GHz). The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom x7211RE uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Atom x7211RE's 2,188 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom x7211RE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5750M vs 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE.

Feature	A10-5750M	Atom x7211RE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+150%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Amston Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark	2,174	2,188
Geekbench 6 Single	320	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5750M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7211RE uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5750M versus LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE — the Atom x7211RE supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (A10-5750M) vs 1 (Atom x7211RE). PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5750M) vs 8 (Atom x7211RE) — the A10-5750M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A76M (A10-5750M) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211RE).

Feature	A10-5750M	Atom x7211RE
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	LPDDR5-4800+67%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	❌	✅
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-5750M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8650G (A10-5750M) and UHD Graphics (16 EU) (Atom x7211RE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop, Atom x7211RE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.