A10-5750M vs Atom x7211RE

A10-5750M vs Atom x7211RE Performance Spectrum

A10-5750M

4 / 4

2,174

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom x7211RE

2 / 2

2,188

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5750M vs Atom x7211RE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5750M vs Atom x7211RE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5750M

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,174 vs 2,188).
❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on FS1r2, while Atom x7211RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Atom x7211RE

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FS1r2 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7211RE better than A10-5750M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5750M is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7211RE pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7211RE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7211RE still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7211RE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7211RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FS1r2, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

A10-5750M vs Atom x7211RE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5750M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7211RE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE — a 9% clock advantage for the A10-5750M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1 GHz). The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom x7211RE uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Atom x7211RE's 2,188 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom x7211RE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5750M vs 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE.

Feature	A10-5750M	Atom x7211RE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+150%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Amston Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark	2,174	2,188
Geekbench 6 Single	320	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5750M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7211RE uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5750M versus LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE — the Atom x7211RE supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (A10-5750M) vs 1 (Atom x7211RE). PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5750M) vs 8 (Atom x7211RE) — the A10-5750M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A76M (A10-5750M) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211RE).

Feature	A10-5750M	Atom x7211RE
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	LPDDR5-4800+157%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-5750M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8650G (A10-5750M) and UHD Graphics (16 EU) (Atom x7211RE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop, Atom x7211RE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.