A10-5750M
VS
Pentium G4400TE

A10-5750M vs Pentium G4400TE

AMD

A10-5750M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium G4400TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-5750M is positioned at rank 1227 and the Pentium G4400TE is on rank 1044, so the Pentium G4400TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5750M

#1215
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
7428%
#1216
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
7319%
#1217
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
6719%
#1218
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
6689%
#1219
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6627%
#1221
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
6400%
#1222
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
6137%
#1223
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
6127%
#1224
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5962%
#1227
A10-5750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
99%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
95%
#1231
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
84%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
71%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
60%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
54%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
52%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
51%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
47%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
43%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G4400TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
42701%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
40348%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
29296%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8826%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6991%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6116%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3503%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3457%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3148%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3147%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3112%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3028%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2986%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2974%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2947%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
100%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
99%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
98%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
97%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
96%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
96%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
94%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
94%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
93%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
93%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
92%
#1055
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
91%
#1056
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
91%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
90%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
89%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A10-5750M leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium G4400TE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA10-5750MPentium G4400TE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA10-5750MPentium G4400TE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-5750M and Pentium G4400TE

AMD

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Pentium G4400TE

The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

The A10-5750M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4400TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE — a 37.3% clock advantage for the A10-5750M. The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G4400TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Pentium G4400TE's 2,190 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G4400TE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5750M vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400TE.

FeatureA10-5750MPentium G4400TE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+46%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,174
2,190
Geekbench 6 Single
320
Geekbench 6 Multi
707
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5750M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4400TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5750M versus DDR4-2133 on the Pentium G4400TE — the Pentium G4400TE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4400TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureA10-5750MPentium G4400TE
Socket
FS1r2
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-5750M) vs VT-x (Pentium G4400TE). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8650G (A10-5750M) and HD Graphics 510 (Pentium G4400TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop, Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.

FeatureA10-5750MPentium G4400TE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8650G
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Desktop