A10-5750M vs Pentium G4400TE

A10-5750M vs Pentium G4400TE Performance Spectrum

A10-5750M

4 / 4

2,174

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G4400TE

2 / 2

2,190

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5750M vs Pentium G4400TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5750M vs Pentium G4400TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5750M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,174 vs 2,190).

Pentium G4400TE

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while A10-5750M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G4400TE better than A10-5750M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5750M is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400TE pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G4400TE is the better buy right now. Pentium G4400TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10-5750M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G4400TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5750M vs Pentium G4400TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Pentium G4400TE

The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5750M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4400TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE — a 37.3% clock advantage for the A10-5750M. The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G4400TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Pentium G4400TE's 2,190 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G4400TE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5750M vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400TE.

Feature	A10-5750M	Pentium G4400TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+46%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,174	2,190
Geekbench 6 Single	320	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5750M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4400TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5750M versus DDR4-2133 on the Pentium G4400TE — the Pentium G4400TE supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4400TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A10-5750M	Pentium G4400TE
Socket	FS1r2	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-5750M) vs VT-x (Pentium G4400TE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8650G (A10-5750M) and HD Graphics 510 (Pentium G4400TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop, Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.