
Core 2 Duo T6570

Core i3-3225
Core 2 Duo T6570 vs Core i3-3225 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo T6570 vs Core i3-3225 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo T6570 vs Core i3-3225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo T6570
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 55W, a 53W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-3225 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,274 vs 2,276).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3225 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-3225.
Core i3-3225
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Core 2 Duo T6570 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo T6570.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $172 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T6570 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌2650% higher power demand at 55W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-3225 better than Core 2 Duo T6570?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo T6570 vs Core i3-3225 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T6570
The Core 2 Duo T6570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,274 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i3-3225
The Core i3-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,276 points. Launch price was $264.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T6570 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3225's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6570 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-3225 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-3225 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T6570 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-3225 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T6570 scores 2,274 against the Core i3-3225's 2,276 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-3225. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 246 vs 558, a 77.6% lead for the Core i3-3225 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Core 2 Duo T6570 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3225.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T6570 | Core i3-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+57% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,274 | 2,276 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 246 | 558+127% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,142 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T6570 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-3225 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T6570 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3225 — the Core i3-3225 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM45,PM45,GL40 (Core 2 Duo T6570) and H77,Z77,Q77,B75,P67,Z68,H67 (Core i3-3225).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T6570 | Core i3-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T6570) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3225). The Core i3-3225 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Duo T6570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T6570 targets Budget, Core i3-3225 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T6570 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U; Core i3-3225 rivals Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T6570 | Core i3-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













