Core 2 Duo T6600
VS
Core i7-3537U

Core 2 Duo T6600 vs Core i7-3537U

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6600

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i7-3537U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T6600 is positioned at rank 13 and the Core i7-3537U is on rank 1165, so the Core 2 Duo T6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6600

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
125%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
123%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
113%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
112%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
111%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
107%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
103%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
103%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
100%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
92%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
91%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
90%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
81%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
78%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
77%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
74%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3537U

#1153
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4321%
#1154
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4258%
#1155
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3909%
#1156
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3891%
#1157
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3855%
#1159
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3723%
#1160
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3570%
#1161
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3564%
#1162
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3468%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1167
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1168
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
98%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
96%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1178
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
95%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3537U leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T6600 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo T6600Core i7-3537U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($4)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo T6600 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 99% cheaper ($4 vs $346) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Duo T6600Core i7-3537U
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+8572%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($4)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T6600 and Core i7-3537U

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6600

The Core 2 Duo T6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,355 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i7-3537U

The Core i7-3537U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T6600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3537U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6600 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3537U — a 34% clock advantage for the Core i7-3537U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T6600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-3537U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T6600 scores 2,355 against the Core i7-3537U's 2,349 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T6600. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3537U.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T6600Core i7-3537U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz+41%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+10%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,355
2,349
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T6600 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-3537U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Core 2 Duo T6600 versus 1600 on the Core i7-3537U — the Core i7-3537U supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3537U supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo T6600) vs 16 (Core i7-3537U) — the Core i7-3537U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6600) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3537U).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T6600Core i7-3537U
Socket
PGA478
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+26214300%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T6600) vs true (Core i7-3537U). The Core i7-3537U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Duo T6600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T6600 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3537U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T6600Core i7-3537U
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Legacy Laptop