Celeron G3920
VS
Core 2 Duo T6600

Celeron G3920 vs Core 2 Duo T6600

Intel

Celeron G3920

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T6600

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3920 is positioned at rank 364 and the Core 2 Duo T6600 is on rank 13, so the Core 2 Duo T6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3920

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5288%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3628%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1093%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
866%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
757%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
434%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
428%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
390%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
390%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
385%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
375%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
370%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
368%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
365%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
99%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
99%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
98%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
97%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
96%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
95%
#364
Celeron G3920
MSRP: $40|Avg: $30
100%
#366
Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP: $109|Avg: $50
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6600

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
125%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
123%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
113%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
112%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
111%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
107%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
103%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
103%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
100%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
92%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
91%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
90%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
81%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
78%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
77%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
74%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3920 (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G3920Core 2 Duo T6600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($4)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T6600 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G3920Core 2 Duo T6600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+649%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($4)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3920 and Core 2 Duo T6600

Intel

Celeron G3920

The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6600

The Core 2 Duo T6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,355 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3920 and Core 2 Duo T6600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6600 — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G3920 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron G3920 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T6600 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Core 2 Duo T6600's 2,355 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G3920. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 699 vs 200, a 111% lead for the Celeron G3920 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 350 (92.1% advantage for the Celeron G3920). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3920 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6600.

FeatureCeleron G3920Core 2 Duo T6600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+32%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+32%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+100%
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,358
2,355
Geekbench 6 Single
699+250%
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
948+171%
350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T6600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3920 versus DDR3-800 on the Core 2 Duo T6600 — the Celeron G3920 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3920 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3920) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T6600) — the Celeron G3920 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3920) and GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6600).

FeatureCeleron G3920Core 2 Duo T6600
Socket
LGA1151
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+700%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G3920 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core 2 Duo T6600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget, Core 2 Duo T6600 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureCeleron G3920Core 2 Duo T6600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Legacy Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($30 vs $4), the Core 2 Duo T6600 is $26 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 78.6 pts/$ vs 588.8 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T6600 — making the Core 2 Duo T6600 the 152.9% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G3920Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP
$40
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$4-87%
Performance per Dollar
78.6
588.8+649%
Release Date
2015
2009