PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3920 vs Celeron G4900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3920 vs Celeron G4900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3920

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
✅Draws 51W instead of 54W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (699 vs 850).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (948 vs 1,550).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Celeron G4900

2018

Why buy it

✅+21.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌
5% HIGHER MSRP
$42 MSRPvs$40 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900 better than Celeron G3920?

Yes. Celeron G4900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 63.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 63.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron G4900 comes in 5.0% more expensive on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $40 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3920 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 4.5% better value on paper (59.0 vs 56.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015), 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3920 vs Celeron G4900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3920

The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3920 and Celeron G4900 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Celeron G3920 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G4900 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Celeron G4900's 2,370 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G4900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 699 vs 850, a 19.5% lead for the Celeron G4900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 1,550 (48.2% advantage for the Celeron G4900). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3920 vs 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Celeron G4900
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	2,358	2,370
Geekbench 6 Single	699	850+22%
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	1,550+64%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3920 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900 — the Celeron G4900 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3920) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900).

Feature	Celeron G3920	Celeron G4900
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3920) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget, Celeron G4900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400; Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Celeron G4900
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3920 was priced at $40, while the Celeron G4900 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($40 vs $42), Celeron G3920 was $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 59.0 pts/$ vs 56.4 pts/$ for the Celeron G4900 — making the Celeron G3920 the 4.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Celeron G4900
MSRP	$40-5%	$42
Performance per Dollar	59.0+5%	56.4
Release Date	2015	2018

Search Celeron G3920 on Amazon

Search Celeron G4900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.