Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-3517UE

Intel

Celeron G3920

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-3517UE

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-3517UE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-3517UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-3517UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3920

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $290 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
  • Delivers 716.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($40 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Core i7-3517UE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,358 vs 2,384).
  • 200% higher power demand at 51W vs 17W.

Core i7-3517UE

2012

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 17W instead of 51W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G3920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($330 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3920 better than Core i7-3517UE?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G3920 is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3517UE pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3517UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G3920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3920 comes in $290 cheaper on MSRP at $40 MSRP versus $330 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-3517UE is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 716.0% better value on MSRP (59.0 vs 7.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-3517UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G3920

The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.

Intel

Core i7-3517UE

The Core i7-3517UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,384 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron G3920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3517UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-3517UE — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G3920 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron G3920 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3517UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Core i7-3517UE's 2,384 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-3517UE. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron G3920Core i7-3517UE
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+4%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+71%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,358
2,384+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
699
Geekbench 6 Multi
948
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3517UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G3920Core i7-3517UE
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3920) / not specified (Core i7-3517UE). The Celeron G3920 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core i7-3517UE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureCeleron G3920Core i7-3517UE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3920 was priced at $40, while the Core i7-3517UE came in at $330. On launch pricing ($40 vs $330), Celeron G3920 was $290 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 59.0 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-3517UE — making the Celeron G3920 the 156.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G3920Core i7-3517UE
MSRP
$40-88%
$330
Performance per Dollar
59.0+719%
7.2
Release Date
2015
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.