Celeron G3920 vs Xeon E5440
Celeron G3920
Xeon E5440
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3920 is positioned at rank 364 and the Xeon E5440 is on rank 1008, so the Celeron G3920 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3920
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5440
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G3920 | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G3920 | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+23%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3920 and Xeon E5440
Celeron G3920
The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.
Xeon E5440
The Xeon E5440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $690.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5440 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5440 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 0.83 GHz on the Xeon E5440 — a 111% clock advantage for the Celeron G3920 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Celeron G3920 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5440 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Xeon E5440's 2,367 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5440. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3920 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5440.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+249% | 0.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+2% | 2.83 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB L2 Cache+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 6 MB (total)+2300% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,358 | 2,367 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 699 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 948 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5440 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3920) / not specified (Xeon E5440). The Celeron G3920 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Xeon E5440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 510 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G3920 launched at $40 MSRP, while the Xeon E5440 debuted at $690. At current prices ($30 vs $37), the Celeron G3920 is $7 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 78.6 pts/$ vs 64.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5440 — making the Celeron G3920 the 20.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-94% | $690 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-19% | $37 |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.6+23% | 64.0 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G3920 and Xeon E5440
