Celeron G3920 vs Core m7-6Y75
Celeron G3920
Core m7-6Y75
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3920 is positioned at rank 364 and the Core m7-6Y75 is on rank 1189, so the Celeron G3920 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3920
Performance Per Dollar Core m7-6Y75
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G3920 | Core m7-6Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($393) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G3920 | Core m7-6Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1207%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($393) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3920 and Core m7-6Y75
Celeron G3920
The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.
Core m7-6Y75
The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m7-6Y75's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core m7-6Y75 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G3920 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Core m7-6Y75's 2,363 — a 0.2% lead for the Core m7-6Y75. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Core m7-6Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.1 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+142% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Skylake-Y (2015) |
| PassMark | 2,358 | 2,363 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 699 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 948 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Core m7-6Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3920) / not specified (Core m7-6Y75). The Celeron G3920 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core m7-6Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Core m7-6Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 510 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G3920 launched at $40 MSRP, while the Core m7-6Y75 debuted at $393. At current prices ($30 vs $393), the Celeron G3920 is $363 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 78.6 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Core m7-6Y75 — making the Celeron G3920 the 171.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Core m7-6Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-90% | $393 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-92% | $393 |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.6+1210% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G3920 and Core m7-6Y75
