Celeron G3920 vs Core m7-6Y75

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3920 vs Core m7-6Y75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3920 vs Core m7-6Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3920

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $353 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Delivers 880.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($40 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Draws 51W instead of 512W, a 461W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,358 vs 2,363).

Core m7-6Y75

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G3920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
❌903.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 51W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3920 better than Core m7-6Y75?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G3920 is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m7-6Y75 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m7-6Y75 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3920 comes in $353 cheaper on MSRP at $40 MSRP versus $393 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core m7-6Y75 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 880.4% better value on MSRP (59.0 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m7-6Y75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3920 vs Core m7-6Y75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3920

The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m7-6Y75's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core m7-6Y75 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G3920 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Core m7-6Y75's 2,363 — a 0.2% lead for the Core m7-6Y75. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core m7-6Y75
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+142%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,358	2,363
Geekbench 6 Single	699	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core m7-6Y75
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3920) / not specified (Core m7-6Y75). The Celeron G3920 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core m7-6Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core m7-6Y75
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3920 was priced at $40, while the Core m7-6Y75 came in at $393. On launch pricing ($40 vs $393), Celeron G3920 was $353 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 59.0 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Core m7-6Y75 — making the Celeron G3920 the 163% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core m7-6Y75
MSRP	$40-90%	$393
Performance per Dollar	59.0+883%	6.0
Release Date	2015	2015

Search Celeron G3920 on Amazon

Search Core m7-6Y75 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.