PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3920 vs Celeron G5905T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3920 vs Celeron G5905T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3920

2015

Why buy it

✅+26.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 47.1 PassMark/$ ($40 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (699 vs 748).
❌45.7% higher power demand at 51W vs 35W.

Celeron G5905T

2020

Why buy it

✅+7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 35W instead of 51W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (750 vs 948).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.1 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5905T better than Celeron G3920?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G5905T is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3920 pulls ahead with 26.4% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 26.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5905T is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron G5905T comes in 25.0% more expensive on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $40 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3920 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 25.1% better value on paper (59.0 vs 47.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5905T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3920 vs Celeron G5905T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3920

The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.

Celeron G5905T

The Celeron G5905T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,356 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3920 and Celeron G5905T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron G3920 is built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Celeron G5905T's 2,356 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G3920. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 699 vs 748, a 6.8% lead for the Celeron G5905T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 750 (23.3% advantage for the Celeron G3920). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3920 vs 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905T.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Celeron G5905T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.3 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	—
PassMark	2,358	2,356
Geekbench 6 Single	699	748+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi	948+26%	750

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G5905T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3920 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5905T — the Celeron G5905T supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5905T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3920) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5905T).

Feature	Celeron G3920	Celeron G5905T
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2666+25%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3920) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5905T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget, Celeron G5905T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400; Celeron G5905T rivals Pentium Gold G6405T.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Celeron G5905T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3920 was priced at $40, while the Celeron G5905T came in at $50. On launch pricing ($40 vs $50), Celeron G3920 was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 59.0 pts/$ vs 47.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G5905T — making the Celeron G3920 the 22.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Celeron G5905T
MSRP	$40-20%	$50
Performance per Dollar	59.0+25%	47.1
Release Date	2015	2020

Search Celeron G3920 on Amazon

Search Celeron G5905T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.