Celeron G3920 vs Core i5-661

Intel

Celeron G3920

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-661

2 Cores4 Thrd87 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G3920 vs Core i5-661 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i5-661 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i5-661: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3920

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $156 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • Delivers 384.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 12.2 PassMark/$ ($40 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • Draws 51W instead of 87W, a 36W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Core i5-661 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,358 vs 2,387).

Core i5-661

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.2 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
    • 70.6% higher power demand at 87W vs 51W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-661 better than Celeron G3920?
    Yes. Core i5-661 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i5-661 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-661 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-661 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-661 comes in 390.0% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $40 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3920 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 384.0% better value on paper (59.0 vs 12.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron G3920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Celeron G3920 vs Core i5-661 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron G3920

    The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.

    Intel

    Core i5-661

    The Core i5-661 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 87 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,387 points. Launch price was $252.

    Processing Power

    The Celeron G3920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-661's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-661 — a 21.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-661 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Celeron G3920 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-661 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Core i5-661's 2,387 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-661. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureCeleron G3920Core i5-661
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.9 GHz
    3.6 GHz+24%
    Base Clock
    2.9 GHz
    3.33 GHz+15%
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    14 nm-56%
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Skylake (2015−2016)
    Clarkdale (2010−2011)
    PassMark
    2,358
    2,387+1%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    699
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    948
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron G3920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-661 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCeleron G3920Core i5-661
    Socket
    LGA1151
    LGA1156
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2133
    Max RAM Capacity
    64 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3920) / not specified (Core i5-661). The Celeron G3920 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core i5-661 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400.

    FeatureCeleron G3920Core i5-661
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    HD Graphics 510
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Budget
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Celeron G3920 was priced at $40, while the Core i5-661 came in at $196. On launch pricing ($40 vs $196), Celeron G3920 was $156 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 59.0 pts/$ vs 12.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-661 — making the Celeron G3920 the 131.5% better value option.

    FeatureCeleron G3920Core i5-661
    MSRP
    $40-80%
    $196
    Performance per Dollar
    59.0+384%
    12.2
    Release Date
    2015
    2010

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.