Core 2 Duo T6670
VS
Athlon II X4 645

Core 2 Duo T6670 vs Athlon II X4 645

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6670

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 645

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T6670 is positioned at rank 474 and the Athlon II X4 645 is on rank 819, so the Core 2 Duo T6670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6670

#462
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
620%
#463
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
611%
#464
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
561%
#465
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
559%
#466
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
553%
#468
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
534%
#469
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
512%
#470
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
512%
#471
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
498%
#474
Core 2 Duo T6670
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#488
Processor U300
MSRP: $193|Avg: $180
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 645

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16537%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15625%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11345%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3418%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2707%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2368%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1356%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1339%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1219%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1219%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1205%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1173%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1156%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1152%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1141%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
96%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
100%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
99%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
99%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
99%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
98%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
98%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
97%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
97%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
97%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
97%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X4 645 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo T6670 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo T6670Athlon II X4 645
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo T6670Athlon II X4 645
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T6670 and Athlon II X4 645

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6670

The Core 2 Duo T6670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,365 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Athlon II X4 645

The Athlon II X4 645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,375 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T6670 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X4 645 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6670 versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X4 645 — a 34% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 645 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T6670 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T6670 scores 2,365 against the Athlon II X4 645's 2,375 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X4 645. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 252 vs 399, a 45.2% lead for the Athlon II X4 645 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 252 vs 1,374 (138% advantage for the Athlon II X4 645). L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6670 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 645.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T6670Athlon II X4 645
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz+41%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz+41%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,365
2,375
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,374
Geekbench 6 Single
252
399+58%
Geekbench 6 Multi
252
1,374+445%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T6670 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 645 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo T6670) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 645) — the Athlon II X4 645 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6670) and AMD 700 Series,AMD 800 Series,AMD 900 Series (Athlon II X4 645).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T6670Athlon II X4 645
Socket
PGA478
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T6670) vs Yes (Athlon II X4 645). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T6670 targets Budget, Athlon II X4 645 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T6670 rivals Core 2 Duo T6600.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T6670Athlon II X4 645
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Yes
Target Use
Budget
Desktop