CPU
GPU
Core 2 Duo T6670
Celeron G4900
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 2 Duo T6670 is positioned at rank #474 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6670
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4900
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T6670 | Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T6670 | Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron G4900
Core 2 Duo T6670
The Core 2 Duo T6670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,365 points. Launch price was $249.
Celeron G4900
The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron G4900 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6670 versus 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 — a 34% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T6670 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G4900 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T6670 scores 2,365 against the Celeron G4900's 2,370 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G4900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 252 vs 850, a 108.5% lead for the Celeron G4900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 252 vs 1,550 (144.1% advantage for the Celeron G4900). L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6670 vs 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T6670 | Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz+41% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,365 | 2,370 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 252 | 850+237% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 252 | 1,550+515% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T6670 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G4900 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T6670 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900 — the Celeron G4900 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4900 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo T6670) vs 16 (Celeron G4900) — the Celeron G4900 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6670) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T6670 | Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR4-2400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G4900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo T6670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T6670 targets Budget, Celeron G4900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T6670 rivals Core 2 Duo T6600; Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T6670 | Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T6670 and Celeron G4900
