Core 2 Duo T7400
VS
Core i3-2377M

Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core i3-2377M

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7400

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Core i3-2377M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7400 is positioned at rank 1027 and the Core i3-2377M is on rank 1151, so the Core 2 Duo T7400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7400

#1015
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2364%
#1016
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2330%
#1017
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2139%
#1018
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2129%
#1019
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2109%
#1021
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2037%
#1022
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1953%
#1023
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1950%
#1024
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1898%
#1027
Core 2 Duo T7400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
98%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
96%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2377M

#1139
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3965%
#1140
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3907%
#1141
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3586%
#1142
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3570%
#1143
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3538%
#1145
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3416%
#1146
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3276%
#1147
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3270%
#1148
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3182%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
99%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
98%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
97%
#1158
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
96%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
93%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
92%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-2377M (2012) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7400Core i3-2377M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7400 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7400Core i3-2377M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7400 and Core i3-2377M

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7400

The Core 2 Duo T7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,861 points. Launch price was $286.

Intel

Core i3-2377M

The Core i3-2377M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T7400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2377M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7400 versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2377M — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7400 (base: 2.16 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7400 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-2377M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7400 scores 1,861 against the Core i3-2377M's 1,850 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 310 vs 238, a 26.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7400 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 550 vs 546 (0.7% advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7400). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7400 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2377M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7400Core i3-2377M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.16 GHz+44%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.16 GHz+44%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,861
1,850
Geekbench 6 Single
310+30%
238
Geekbench 6 Multi
550
546
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T7400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2377M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7400 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2377M — the Core i3-2377M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2377M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 945GT,GME965 (Core 2 Duo T7400) and FCBGA1023 (Core i3-2377M).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7400Core i3-2377M
Socket
PGA478
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR3-1333+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
16 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7400) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-2377M). The Core i3-2377M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo T7400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7400 targets Legacy Laptop.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7400Core i3-2377M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Legacy Laptop