Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Pentium 1403

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Pentium 1403 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Pentium 1403: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo T7400

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 1403

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo T7400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,851 vs 1,861).
❌1900% higher power demand at 80W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T7400 better than Pentium 1403?

Yes. Core 2 Duo T7400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo T7400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T7400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T7400 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T7400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 1403 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Pentium 1403 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T7400

The Core 2 Duo T7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,861 points. Launch price was $286.

Pentium 1403

The Pentium 1403 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 5 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,851 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T7400 and Pentium 1403 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Core 2 Duo T7400 is built on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7400 scores 1,861 against the Pentium 1403's 1,851 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7400. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7400 vs 5 MB on the Pentium 1403.

Feature	Core 2 Duo T7400	Pentium 1403
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.16 GHz	2.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	0 kB	5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	—
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	—
PassMark	1,861	1,851
Geekbench 6 Single	310	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	550	—