
Core 2 Duo T7400

Core i3-4100E
Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core i3-4100E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core i3-4100E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core i3-4100E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo T7400
2006Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (310 vs 550).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4100E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-4100E
2013Why buy it
- ✅+77.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core 2 Duo T7400 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,848 vs 1,861).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T7400 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4100E better than Core 2 Duo T7400?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core i3-4100E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T7400
The Core 2 Duo T7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,861 points. Launch price was $286.

Core i3-4100E
The Core i3-4100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,848 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T7400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4100E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7400 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4100E — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-4100E (base: 2.16 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7400 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-4100E uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7400 scores 1,861 against the Core i3-4100E's 1,848 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 310 vs 550, a 55.8% lead for the Core i3-4100E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7400 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4100E.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7400 | Core i3-4100E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.16 GHz | 2.4 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.16 GHz | 2.4 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256K (per core)+6300% |
| Process | 65 nm | 22 nm-66% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,861 | 1,848 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 310 | 550+77% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 550 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-4100E uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7400 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100E — the Core i3-4100E supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4100E supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 945GT,GME965 (Core 2 Duo T7400) and QM87,HM86,HM87 (Core i3-4100E).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7400 | Core i3-4100E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | BGA1364 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3L-1600+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7400) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-4100E). The Core i3-4100E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core 2 Duo T7400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7400 targets Legacy Laptop, Core i3-4100E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4100E rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7400 | Core i3-4100E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Embedded |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













