Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Atom x7211E
Core 2 Duo T7700
Atom x7211E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7700 is positioned at rank 484 and the Atom x7211E is on rank 240, so the Atom x7211E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7700
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7700 | Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7700 | Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7700 and Atom x7211E
Core 2 Duo T7700
The Core 2 Duo T7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,554 points. Launch price was $307.
Atom x7211E
The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T7700 and Atom x7211E share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7700 versus 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Atom x7211E (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7700 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom x7211E uses Gracemont (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7700 scores 2,554 against the Atom x7211E's 2,553 — a 0% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7700 vs 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211E.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7700 | Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+140% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB (total) |
| Process | 65 nm | 10 nm-85% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Gracemont (2023) |
| PassMark | 2,554 | 2,553 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 254 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom x7211E uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7700 versus DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211E — the Atom x7211E supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7211E supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo T7700) vs 1 (Atom x7211E). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo T7700) vs 9 (Atom x7211E) — the Core 2 Duo T7700 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL960,GME965,GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7700) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211E).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7700 | Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR5-4800+150% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+78% | 9 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7700) / not specified (Atom x7211E). The Atom x7211E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7700 | Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T7700 and Atom x7211E
