Core 2 Duo T7700
VS
Core i3-7020U

Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Core i3-7020U

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7700

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2007
VS
Intel

Core i3-7020U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7700 is positioned at rank 484 and the Core i3-7020U is on rank 70, so the Core i3-7020U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7700

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#472
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
632%
#473
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
623%
#474
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
571%
#475
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
569%
#476
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
564%
#478
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
544%
#479
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
522%
#480
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
521%
#481
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
507%
#484
Core 2 Duo T7700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#488
Processor U300
MSRP: $193|Avg: $180
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7020U

#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
94%
#58
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
229%
#59
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
225%
#60
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
207%
#61
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
206%
#62
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
204%
#64
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
197%
#65
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
189%
#66
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
189%
#67
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
183%
#70
Core i3-7020U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
97%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7020U (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7700Core i3-7020U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7700 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7700Core i3-7020U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7700 and Core i3-7020U

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7700

The Core 2 Duo T7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,554 points. Launch price was $307.

Intel

Core i3-7020U

The Core i3-7020U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,567 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T7700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-7020U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7700 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-7020U — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7700 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7700 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-7020U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7700 scores 2,554 against the Core i3-7020U's 2,567 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-7020U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7700 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7020U.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7700Core i3-7020U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+4%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+4%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512 kB
Process
65 nm
14 nm-78%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,554
2,567
Geekbench 6 Single
254
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T7700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-7020U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7700Core i3-7020U
Socket
PGA478
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7700) / not specified (Core i3-7020U). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7700Core i3-7020U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget