Celeron G5920
VS
Core 2 Duo T7700

Celeron G5920 vs Core 2 Duo T7700

Intel

Celeron G5920

2 Cores2 Thrd58 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T7700

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5920

#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
104%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
34%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
104%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
103%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
103%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
32%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
103%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
103%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
103%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
102%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
30%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
102%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
28%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
102%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
102%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
101%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
26%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
101%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
23%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
100%
#301
Core i7-10700T
MSRP: $355|Avg: $200
100%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
21%
#302
Celeron G5920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
100%
#303
Core i3-10105T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $122
99%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
21%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
16%
#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
99%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
99%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
98%
#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
97%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7700

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#472
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
632%
#473
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
623%
#474
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
571%
#475
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
569%
#476
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
564%
#478
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
544%
#479
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
522%
#480
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
521%
#481
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
507%
#484
Core 2 Duo T7700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#488
Processor U300
MSRP: $193|Avg: $180
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G5920 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G5920Core 2 Duo T7700
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7700 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G5920Core 2 Duo T7700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G5920 and Core 2 Duo T7700

Intel

Celeron G5920

The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7700

The Core 2 Duo T7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,554 points. Launch price was $307.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G5920 and Core 2 Duo T7700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7700 — a 37.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G5920 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron G5920 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5920 scores 2,577 against the Core 2 Duo T7700's 2,554 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G5920. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 756 vs 254, a 99.4% lead for the Celeron G5920 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7700.

FeatureCeleron G5920Core 2 Duo T7700
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+46%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+46%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
2,577
2,554
Geekbench 6 Single
756+198%
254
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,248
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5920 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5920 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7700 — the Celeron G5920 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5920 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5920) and GL960,GME965,GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7700).

FeatureCeleron G5920Core 2 Duo T7700
Socket
LGA1200
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+100%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+3100%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G5920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget, Core 2 Duo T7700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405; Core 2 Duo T7700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

FeatureCeleron G5920Core 2 Duo T7700
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Budget