Celeron G5920 vs Xeon X3380

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5920 vs Xeon X3380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5920 vs Xeon X3380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5920

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 58W instead of 95W, a 37W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon X3380 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Xeon X3380 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X3380

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,568 vs 2,577).
❌63.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 58W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5920 better than Xeon X3380?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G5920 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5920 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $52 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X3380 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (49.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5920 vs Xeon X3380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5920

The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X3380

The Xeon X3380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.16 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,568 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5920 is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5920 scores 2,577 against the Xeon X3380's 2,568 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G5920. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3380.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Xeon X3380
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+11%	3.16 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	—
PassMark	2,577	2,568
Geekbench 6 Single	756	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5920 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3380 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Xeon X3380
Socket	LGA1200	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5920) / not specified (Xeon X3380). The Celeron G5920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon X3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.