PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5920 vs Core i3-7102E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5920 vs Core i3-7102E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5920

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $173 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 329.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.6 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (756 vs 1,962).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,248 vs 1,898).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌132% higher power demand at 58W vs 25W.

Core i3-7102E

2017

Why buy it

✅+159.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 58W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 49.6 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7102E better than Celeron G5920?

Yes. Core i3-7102E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 52.1% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.9% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-7102E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7102E is the stronger fit. You are getting 52.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7102E is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i3-7102E comes in 332.7% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5920 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,577 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5920 vs Core i3-7102E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5920

The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-7102E

The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-7102E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-7102E — a 50% clock advantage for the Celeron G5920. The Celeron G5920 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7102E uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5920 scores 2,577 against the Core i3-7102E's 2,599 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-7102E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 756 vs 1,962, a 88.7% lead for the Core i3-7102E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,248 vs 1,898 (41.3% advantage for the Core i3-7102E). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i3-7102E
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+67%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,577	2,599
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	659
Geekbench 6 Single	756	1,962+160%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	1,898+52%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5920 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7102E — the Celeron G5920 supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5920 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5920) and Intel 100 Series,Intel 200 Series (Core i3-7102E).

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i3-7102E
Socket	LGA1200	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+11%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5920) vs Yes (Core i3-7102E). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5920) and Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7102E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i3-7102E
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	Intel HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	Yes
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5920 was priced at $52, while the Core i3-7102E came in at $225. On launch pricing ($52 vs $225), Celeron G5920 was $173 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5920 delivers 49.6 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Core i3-7102E — making the Celeron G5920 the 124.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i3-7102E
MSRP	$52-77%	$225
Performance per Dollar	49.6+328%	11.6
Release Date	2020	2017

Search Celeron G5920 on Amazon

Search Core i3-7102E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.