PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5920 vs Core i5-7Y57 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5920 vs Core i5-7Y57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5920

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 438.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.6 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,577 vs 2,585).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌1188.9% higher power demand at 58W vs 4.5W.

Core i5-7Y57

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 58W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G5920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 49.6 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5920 better than Core i5-7Y57?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G5920 is ahead with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7Y57 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core i5-7Y57 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7Y57 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5920 comes in $229 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-7Y57 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 438.7% better value on MSRP (49.6 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5920 vs Core i5-7Y57 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5920

The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-7Y57

The Core i5-7Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,585 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-7Y57's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-7Y57 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Celeron G5920 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G5920 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-7Y57 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5920 scores 2,577 against the Core i5-7Y57's 2,585 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-7Y57. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y57.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i5-7Y57
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+6%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+192%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	4 MB+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,577	2,585
Geekbench 6 Single	756	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5920 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7Y57 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5920 versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y57 — the Celeron G5920 supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5920 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5920) vs 12 (Core i5-7Y57) — the Celeron G5920 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i5-7Y57
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+43%	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+700%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5920) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7Y57). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5920) and HD Graphics 615 (Core i5-7Y57) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget, Core i5-7Y57 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i5-7Y57
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	HD Graphics 615
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5920 was priced at $52, while the Core i5-7Y57 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($52 vs $281), Celeron G5920 was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5920 delivers 49.6 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-7Y57 — making the Celeron G5920 the 137.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i5-7Y57
MSRP	$52-81%	$281
Performance per Dollar	49.6+439%	9.2
Release Date	2020	2017

Search Celeron G5920 on Amazon

Search Core i5-7Y57 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.