A8-6500 vs Celeron G5920

A8-6500 vs Celeron G5920 Performance Spectrum

A8-6500

4 / 4

2,598

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G5920

2 / 2

2,577

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6500 vs Celeron G5920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6500 vs Celeron G5920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6500

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron G5920.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron G5920

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 58W instead of 65W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-6500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,577 vs 2,598).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while A8-6500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-6500.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-6500 better than Celeron G5920?

Yes. A8-6500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-6500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-6500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-6500 is still the better call for a fresh build. A8-6500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5920 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,577 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-6500 vs Celeron G5920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-6500

The A8-6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,598 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron G5920

The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-6500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G5920 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-6500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A8-6500 versus 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the A8-6500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The A8-6500 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G5920 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500 scores 2,598 against the Celeron G5920's 2,577 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-6500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-6500 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920.

Feature	A8-6500	Celeron G5920
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+17%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	2,598	2,577
Geekbench 6 Single	—	756
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,248

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G5920 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5920 — the Celeron G5920 supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5920 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5920).

Feature	A8-6500	Celeron G5920
Socket	FM2	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866	DDR4-2666+43%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6500) vs VT-x (Celeron G5920). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8570D (A8-6500) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5920) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-6500 rivals Core i3-4130; Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.