A8-6500
VS
Core i5-7Y54

A8-6500 vs Core i5-7Y54

AMD

A8-6500

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-7Y54

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-6500 is positioned at rank 474 and the Core i5-7Y54 is on rank 1101, so the A8-6500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-6500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7199%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6802%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4939%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1488%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1179%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1031%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
591%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
583%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
531%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
531%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
525%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
511%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
503%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
501%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
497%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
100%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
99%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
99%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
99%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
96%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
96%
#474
A8-6500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
100%
#480
Athlon X4 860K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
99%
#483
Core i7-8700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $110
97%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7Y54

#1089
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3189%
#1090
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3142%
#1091
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2885%
#1092
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2872%
#1093
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2845%
#1095
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2748%
#1096
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2635%
#1097
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2630%
#1098
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2560%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
100%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
#1107
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
96%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
95%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
94%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
94%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-6500 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-7Y54 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-6500Core i5-7Y54
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-6500Core i5-7Y54
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-6500 and Core i5-7Y54

AMD

A8-6500

The A8-6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,598 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i5-7Y54

The Core i5-7Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,586 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The A8-6500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-7Y54 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A8-6500 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-7Y54 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the A8-6500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The A8-6500 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7Y54 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500 scores 2,598 against the Core i5-7Y54's 2,586 — a 0.5% lead for the A8-6500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-6500 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y54.

FeatureA8-6500Core i5-7Y54
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+28%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+192%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB
L2 Cache
4096 kB+700%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,598
2,586
Geekbench 6 Single
900
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7Y54 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500 versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y54 — the A8-6500 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500 supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-6500) vs 10 (Core i5-7Y54) — the A8-6500 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500) and SoC (Core i5-7Y54).

FeatureA8-6500Core i5-7Y54
Socket
FM2
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1866+62100%
LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
64
16 GB+26214300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+60%
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6500) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7Y54). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8570D (A8-6500) and Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core i5-7Y54) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y54 targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: A8-6500 rivals Core i3-4130.

FeatureA8-6500Core i5-7Y54
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8570D
Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Tablet/2-in-1