A8-6500
VS
Core i5-680

A8-6500 vs Core i5-680

AMD

A8-6500

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-680

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.86 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-6500 is positioned at rank 474 and the Core i5-680 is on rank 1014, so the A8-6500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-6500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7199%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6802%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4939%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1488%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1179%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1031%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
591%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
583%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
531%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
531%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
525%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
511%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
503%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
501%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
497%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
100%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
99%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
99%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
99%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
96%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
96%
#474
A8-6500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
100%
#480
Athlon X4 860K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
99%
#483
Core i7-8700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $110
97%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-680

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
34985%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
33057%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24002%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7231%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5728%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5011%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2870%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2832%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2579%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2579%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2550%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2481%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2446%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2436%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2414%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
100%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
100%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
98%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
97%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
97%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
97%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
96%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
95%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
94%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
91%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
91%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-6500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-680 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA8-6500Core i5-680
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-6500Core i5-680
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-6500 and Core i5-680

AMD

A8-6500

The A8-6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,598 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i5-680

The Core i5-680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,620 points. Launch price was $272.

Processing Power

The A8-6500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-680 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A8-6500 versus 3.86 GHz on the Core i5-680 — a 6% clock advantage for the A8-6500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A8-6500 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-680 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500 scores 2,598 against the Core i5-680's 2,620 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-680. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-6500 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-680.

FeatureA8-6500Core i5-680
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+6%
3.86 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,598
2,620
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-680 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-680 — the A8-6500 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500 supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureA8-6500Core i5-680
Socket
FM2
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1866+62100%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
64
16 GB+26214300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6500) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-680). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8570D (A8-6500) and HD Graphics (Core i5-680) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-680 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-6500 rivals Core i3-4130.

FeatureA8-6500Core i5-680
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8570D
HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop