A8-6500 vs Core i5-7Y57

A8-6500 vs Core i5-7Y57 Performance Spectrum

A8-6500

4 / 4

2,598

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-7Y57

2 / 4

2,585

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6500 vs Core i5-7Y57 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6500 vs Core i5-7Y57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6500

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i5-7Y57.

Trade-offs

❌1344.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 4.5W.

Core i5-7Y57

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-6500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,585 vs 2,598).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while A8-6500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-6500.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-6500 better than Core i5-7Y57?

Yes. A8-6500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-6500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-6500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-6500 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A8-6500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-7Y57 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7Y57 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-6500 vs Core i5-7Y57 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-6500

The A8-6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,598 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-7Y57

The Core i5-7Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,585 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-6500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-7Y57 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A8-6500 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-7Y57 — a 21.6% clock advantage for the A8-6500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The A8-6500 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7Y57 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500 scores 2,598 against the Core i5-7Y57's 2,585 — a 0.5% lead for the A8-6500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-6500 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y57.

Feature	A8-6500	Core i5-7Y57
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+24%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+192%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,598	2,585

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7Y57 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1866 memory speed. The A8-6500 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-6500) vs 12 (Core i5-7Y57) — the A8-6500 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-6500	Core i5-7Y57
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6500) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7Y57). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8570D (A8-6500) and HD Graphics 615 (Core i5-7Y57) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y57 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-6500 rivals Core i3-4130.