
Celeron G5920

FX-7600P
Celeron G5920 vs FX-7600P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G5920 vs FX-7600P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G5920 vs FX-7600P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G5920
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $98 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 190.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.6 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while FX-7600P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌65.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 35W.
FX-7600P
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 58W, a 23W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,557 vs 2,577).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 49.6 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G5920 better than FX-7600P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G5920 vs FX-7600P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5920
The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-7600P
The FX-7600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,557 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G5920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-7600P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-7600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 versus 3.6 GHz on the FX-7600P — a 2.8% clock advantage for the FX-7600P (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron G5920 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-7600P uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5920 scores 2,577 against the FX-7600P's 2,557 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G5920.
| Feature | Celeron G5920 | FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+30% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm-50% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,577 | 2,557 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 756 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,248 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G5920 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-7600P uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G5920 | FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5920) / not specified (FX-7600P). The Celeron G5920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the FX-7600P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.
| Feature | Celeron G5920 | FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G5920 was priced at $52, while the FX-7600P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($52 vs $150), Celeron G5920 was $98 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5920 delivers 49.6 pts/$ vs 17.0 pts/$ for the FX-7600P — making the Celeron G5920 the 97.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G5920 | FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-65% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.6+192% | 17.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















