Celeron G5920 vs Core i3-7020U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5920 vs Core i3-7020U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5920 vs Core i3-7020U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5920

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i3-7020U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Core i3-7020U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌286.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 15W.

Core i3-7020U

2018

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 58W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G5920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,567 vs 2,577).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5920 better than Core i3-7020U?

Yes. Celeron G5920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G5920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5920 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $52 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (49.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5920 vs Core i3-7020U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5920

The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-7020U

The Core i3-7020U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,567 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-7020U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-7020U — a 41.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G5920 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron G5920 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7020U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5920 scores 2,577 against the Core i3-7020U's 2,567 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G5920. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7020U.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i3-7020U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+52%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+52%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,577	2,567
Geekbench 6 Single	756	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5920 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7020U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G5920	Core i3-7020U
Socket	LGA1200	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5920) / not specified (Core i3-7020U). The Celeron G5920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i3-7020U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.