
Celeron G4920

Core 2 Duo T7700
Celeron G4920 vs Core 2 Duo T7700 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G4920 vs Core 2 Duo T7700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Civilization VI
Celeron G4920 vs Core 2 Duo T7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G4920
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core 2 Duo T7700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T7700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1250% higher power demand at 54W vs 4W.
Core 2 Duo T7700
2007Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 54W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4920 across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,554 vs 2,555).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G4920 better than Core 2 Duo T7700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4920 vs Core 2 Duo T7700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4920
The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Core 2 Duo T7700
The Core 2 Duo T7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,554 points. Launch price was $307.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G4920 and Core 2 Duo T7700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4920 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7700 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G4920 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron G4920 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Core 2 Duo T7700's 2,554 — a 0% lead for the Celeron G4920. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 672 vs 254, a 90.3% lead for the Celeron G4920 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4920 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7700.
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+33% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+33% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+6300% | 4 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,555 | 2,554 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 672+165% | 254 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,229 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4920 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7700 — the Celeron G4920 supports 259.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4920 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4920) and GL960,GME965,GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7700).
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+260% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+1500% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G4920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget, Core 2 Duo T7700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420; Core 2 Duo T7700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













