Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-7Y57

CPU

GPU

Celeron G4920

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2018

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-7Y57

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2017

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-7Y57 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G4920

2 / 2

2,555

0.0%

2,585

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-7Y57 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-7Y57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4920

2018

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 434.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,555 vs 2,585).
❌1100% higher power demand at 54W vs 4.5W.

Core i5-7Y57

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 54W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7Y57 better than Celeron G4920?

Yes. Core i5-7Y57 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-7Y57 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7Y57 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-7Y57 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-7Y57 comes in 440.4% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G4920 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 434.1% better value on paper (49.1 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-7Y57 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4920

The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i5-7Y57

The Core i5-7Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,585 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-7Y57's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4920 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-7Y57 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-7Y57 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G4920 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-7Y57 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Core i5-7Y57's 2,585 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-7Y57. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4920 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y57.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-7Y57
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+167%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,555	2,585+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7Y57 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4920 versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y57 — the Celeron G4920 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4920 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G4920) vs 12 (Core i5-7Y57) — the Celeron G4920 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-7Y57
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+29%	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4920) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7Y57). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4920) and HD Graphics 615 (Core i5-7Y57) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget, Core i5-7Y57 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-7Y57
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	HD Graphics 615
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4920 was priced at $52, while the Core i5-7Y57 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($52 vs $281), Celeron G4920 was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4920 delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-7Y57 — making the Celeron G4920 the 136.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-7Y57
MSRP	$52-81%	$281
Performance per Dollar	49.1+434%	9.2
Release Date	2018	2017

Search Celeron G4920 on Amazon

Search Core i5-7Y57 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.