
Celeron G4920

Core i5-3230M
Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-3230M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-3230M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Warzone
Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-3230M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G4920
2018Why buy it
- β +18.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Costs $173 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- β Delivers 331.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- β Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-3230M
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (565 vs 672).
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (1,128 vs 1,229).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- β848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G4920 better than Core i5-3230M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-3230M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4920
The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i5-3230M
The Core i5-3230M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,565 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Celeron G4920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-3230M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4920 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3230M β identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron G4920 uses the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-3230M uses Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Core i5-3230M's 2,565 β a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-3230M. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 672 vs 565, a 17.3% lead for the Celeron G4920 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,229 vs 1,128 (8.6% advantage for the Celeron G4920). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4920 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3230M.
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+23% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+100% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017β2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) |
| PassMark | 2,555 | 2,565 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 672+19% | 565 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,229+9% | 1,128 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3230M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4920 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-3230M β the Celeron G4920 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4920 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4920) and HM76,HM77 (Core i5-3230M).
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+50% | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4920) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3230M). Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4920) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3230M) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget, Core i5-3230M targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420; Core i5-3230M rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G4920 was priced at $52, while the Core i5-3230M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($52 vs $225), Celeron G4920 was $173 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4920 delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-3230M β making the Celeron G4920 the 124.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-77% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.1+331% | 11.4 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














