Celeron G4920 vs Xeon X3380

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4920 vs Xeon X3380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4920 vs Xeon X3380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4920

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon X3380 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3380 across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,555 vs 2,568).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Xeon X3380 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X3380

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3380 better than Celeron G4920?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G4920 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3380 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 42 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3380 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X3380 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon X3380 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G4920 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (49.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4920 vs Xeon X3380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4920

The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Xeon X3380

The Xeon X3380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.16 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,568 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4920 is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Xeon X3380's 2,568 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X3380. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4920 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3380.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Xeon X3380
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+1%	3.16 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	—
PassMark	2,555	2,568
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3380 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Xeon X3380
Socket	LGA1151	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4920) / not specified (Xeon X3380). The Celeron G4920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon X3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420.