Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-750

Intel

Celeron G4920

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i5-750

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2009

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-750 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4920

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Costs $158 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 305.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i5-750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-750.

Core i5-750

2009

Why buy it

  • βœ…+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G4920.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4920 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (2,546 vs 2,555).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($210 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
  • ❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4920 better than Core i5-750?
Yes. Celeron G4920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G4920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4920 comes in $158 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $210 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 305.3% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 12.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G4920

The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Intel

Core i5-750

The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009βˆ’2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.

⚑

Processing Power

The Celeron G4920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4920 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 β€” identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron G4920 uses the Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-750 uses Lynnfield (2009βˆ’2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Core i5-750's 2,546 β€” a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G4920. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 672 vs 424, a 45.3% lead for the Celeron G4920 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4920 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750.

FeatureCeleron G4920Core i5-750
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+20%
2.66 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019)
Lynnfield (2009βˆ’2010)
PassMark
2,555
2,546
Geekbench 6 Single
672+58%
424
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,229
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-750 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4920 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-750 β€” the Celeron G4920 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4920 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β€” 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4920) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-750).

FeatureCeleron G4920Core i5-750
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+80%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4920) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750). The Celeron G4920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget, Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420; Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965.

FeatureCeleron G4920Core i5-750
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Legacy Desktop
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4920 was priced at $52, while the Core i5-750 came in at $210. On launch pricing ($52 vs $210), Celeron G4920 was $158 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4920 delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 12.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-750 β€” making the Celeron G4920 the 120.8% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G4920Core i5-750
MSRP
$52-75%
$210
Performance per Dollar
49.1+306%
12.1
Release Date
2018
2009

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.