
Celeron G4920

Core i5-750
Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-750 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Warzone
Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G4920
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $158 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
- β Delivers 305.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
- β Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i5-750 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-750.
Core i5-750
2009Why buy it
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G4920.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4920 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,546 vs 2,555).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($210 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- β75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron G4920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G4920 better than Core i5-750?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4920
The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i5-750
The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009β2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.
Processing Power
The Celeron G4920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4920 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 β identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron G4920 uses the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-750 uses Lynnfield (2009β2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Core i5-750's 2,546 β a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G4920. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 672 vs 424, a 45.3% lead for the Celeron G4920 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4920 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750.
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+20% | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017β2019) | Lynnfield (2009β2010) |
| PassMark | 2,555 | 2,546 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 672+58% | 424 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,229 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-750 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4920 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-750 β the Celeron G4920 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4920 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4920) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-750).
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+80% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4920) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750). The Celeron G4920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget, Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420; Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965.
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G4920 was priced at $52, while the Core i5-750 came in at $210. On launch pricing ($52 vs $210), Celeron G4920 was $158 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4920 delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 12.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-750 β making the Celeron G4920 the 120.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G4920 | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-75% | $210 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.1+306% | 12.1 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














