Celeron G4920 vs Core i3-7020U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i3-7020U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i3-7020U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4920

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i3-7020U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,555 vs 2,567).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Core i3-7020U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌260% higher power demand at 54W vs 15W.

Core i3-7020U

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 54W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7020U better than Celeron G4920?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G4920 is ahead with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7020U pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Celeron G4920 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7020U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7020U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-7020U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Celeron G4920 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (49.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7020U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i3-7020U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4920

The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i3-7020U

The Core i3-7020U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,567 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-7020U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4920 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-7020U — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G4920 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron G4920 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7020U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Core i3-7020U's 2,567 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-7020U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4920 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7020U.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i3-7020U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+100%	3 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,555	2,567
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7020U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i3-7020U
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4920) / not specified (Core i3-7020U). The Celeron G4920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i3-7020U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420.