PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4920

2018

Why buy it

✅+5.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $232 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
✅Delivers 446.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 73W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-670.

Core i5-670

2010

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G4920.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (638 vs 672).
❌Lower PassMark (2,553 vs 2,555).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($284 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
❌35.2% higher power demand at 73W vs 54W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4920 better than Core i5-670?

Yes. Celeron G4920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4920 comes in $232 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $284 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 446.6% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 9.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010), 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4920

The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i5-670

The Core i5-670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $252.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-670's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4920 versus 3.73 GHz on the Core i5-670 — a 15.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-670 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.46 GHz). The Celeron G4920 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-670 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Core i5-670's 2,553 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G4920. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 672 vs 638, a 5.2% lead for the Celeron G4920 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4920 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-670.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-670
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.73 GHz+17%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.46 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,555	2,553
Geekbench 6 Single	672+5%	638
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-670 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4920 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-670 — the Celeron G4920 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4920 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4920) and H55,H57,P55,Q57 (Core i5-670).

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-670
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+80%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4920) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-670). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4920) and HD Graphics (Core i5-670) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget, Core i5-670 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420; Core i5-670 rivals Phenom II X4 955.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-670
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	HD Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Legacy Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4920 was priced at $52, while the Core i5-670 came in at $284. On launch pricing ($52 vs $284), Celeron G4920 was $232 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4920 delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-670 — making the Celeron G4920 the 138.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-670
MSRP	$52-82%	$284
Performance per Dollar	49.1+446%	9.0
Release Date	2018	2010

Search Celeron G4920 on Amazon

Search Core i5-670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.