PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-7Y54 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-7Y54: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4920

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 433.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,229 vs 1,700).
❌1100% higher power demand at 54W vs 4.5W.

Core i5-7Y54

2016

Why buy it

✅+38.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 5W instead of 54W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4920 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4920 better than Core i5-7Y54?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G4920 is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7Y54 pulls ahead with 38.3% better Geekbench multi-core. Celeron G4920 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7Y54 is the stronger fit. You are getting 38.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4920 comes in $229 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-7Y54 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 38.3% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 433.9% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4920 vs Core i5-7Y54 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4920

The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i5-7Y54

The Core i5-7Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,586 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-7Y54's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4920 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-7Y54 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G4920 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-7Y54 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Core i5-7Y54's 2,586 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-7Y54. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 672 vs 900, a 29% lead for the Core i5-7Y54 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,229 vs 1,700 (32.2% advantage for the Core i5-7Y54). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4920 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y54.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-7Y54
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+167%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,555	2,586+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	672	900+34%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	1,700+38%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7Y54 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4920 versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y54 — the Celeron G4920 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4920 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G4920) vs 10 (Core i5-7Y54) — the Celeron G4920 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4920) and SoC (Core i5-7Y54).

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-7Y54
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+29%	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+60%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4920) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7Y54). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4920) and Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core i5-7Y54) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget, Core i5-7Y54 targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-7Y54
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Tablet/2-in-1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4920 was priced at $52, while the Core i5-7Y54 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($52 vs $281), Celeron G4920 was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4920 delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-7Y54 — making the Celeron G4920 the 136.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Core i5-7Y54
MSRP	$52-81%	$281
Performance per Dollar	49.1+434%	9.2
Release Date	2018	2016

Search Celeron G4920 on Amazon

Search Core i5-7Y54 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.