
Core 2 Duo T8300

Phenom II X3 700e
Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Phenom II X3 700e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Phenom II X3 700e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Phenom II X3 700e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo T8300
2008Why buy it
- ✅+80% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
Phenom II X3 700e
2009Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 450).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (650 vs 850).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $125 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T8300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo T8300 better than Phenom II X3 700e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Phenom II X3 700e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T8300
The Core 2 Duo T8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $241.

Phenom II X3 700e
The Phenom II X3 700e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T8300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X3 700e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 700e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8300 versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X3 700e — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T8300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T8300 scores 1,472 against the Phenom II X3 700e's 1,451 — a 1.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 250, a 57.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 850 vs 650 (26.7% advantage for the Core 2 Duo T8300). L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T8300 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 700e.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8300 | Phenom II X3 700e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 3 / 3+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Heka (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,472+1% | 1,451 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450+80% | 250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 850+31% | 650 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T8300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T8300 versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 700e — the Phenom II X3 700e supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Phenom II X3 700e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo T8300) vs 16 (Phenom II X3 700e) — the Phenom II X3 700e offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T8300) and AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 700e).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8300 | Phenom II X3 700e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1333+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X3 700e has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T8300) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X3 700e). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T8300 targets Legacy Laptop, Phenom II X3 700e targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8300 | Phenom II X3 700e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















