C-60 vs Core 2 Duo T8300
C-60
Core 2 Duo T8300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The C-60 is positioned at rank 704 and the Core 2 Duo T8300 is on rank 710, so the C-60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar C-60
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T8300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | C-60 | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ontario (2011−2012) / 40 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | C-60 | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of C-60 and Core 2 Duo T8300
C-60
The C-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,483 points. Launch price was $69.
Core 2 Duo T8300
The Core 2 Duo T8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $241.
Processing Power
Both the C-60 and Core 2 Duo T8300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-60 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8300 — a 57.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T8300 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The C-60 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the C-60 scores 1,483 against the Core 2 Duo T8300's 1,472 — a 0.7% lead for the C-60. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-60 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T8300.
| Feature | C-60 | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.33 GHz | 2.4 GHz+80% |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.4 GHz+140% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 3 MB+500% |
| Process | 40 nm-11% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Ontario (2011−2012) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,483 | 1,472 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 450 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 850 |
Memory & Platform
The C-60 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-60 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T8300 — the C-60 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo T8300 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-60) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo T8300). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-60) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T8300) — the C-60 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-60) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T8300).
| Feature | C-60 | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT1 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (C-60) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T8300). The C-60 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6290), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T8300 targets Legacy Laptop.
| Feature | C-60 | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6290 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on C-60 and Core 2 Duo T8300
