C-60 vs Core i5-4300Y

C-60 vs Core i5-4300Y Performance Spectrum

C-60

2 / 2

1,483

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4300Y

2 / 4

1,485

+0.1%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-60 vs Core i5-4300Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-60 vs Core i5-4300Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-60

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 512W, a 503W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6290, while Core i5-4300Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,483 vs 1,485).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Core i5-4300Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4300Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌5588.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 9W.
❌No integrated graphics, while C-60 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4300Y better than C-60?

Yes. Core i5-4300Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4300Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4300Y is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i5-4300Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. C-60 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4300Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

C-60 vs Core i5-4300Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-60

The C-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,483 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4300Y

The Core i5-4300Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The C-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4300Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-60 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300Y — a 53.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4300Y (base: 1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The C-60 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Core i5-4300Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the C-60 scores 1,483 against the Core i5-4300Y's 1,485 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4300Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-60 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4300Y.

Feature	C-60	Core i5-4300Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	2.3 GHz+73%
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.6 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	40 nm	22 nm-45%
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,483	1,485

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-60 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4300Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.