C-60 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

CPU

GPU

C-60

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011

Buy on Amazon

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009

Buy on Amazon

C-60 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 Performance Spectrum

C-60

2 / 2

1,483

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 / 2

1,496

+0.9%

Pentium U5600

Core i5-540UM

Pentium Extreme Edition 965

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-60 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-60 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-60

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 473.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.7 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6290, while Core 2 Duo SU7300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,483 vs 1,496).
❌200% higher power demand at 9W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 9W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 29.7 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while C-60 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is C-60 better than Core 2 Duo SU7300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, C-60 is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

C-60 is the better buy right now. C-60 comes in $239 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo SU7300 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 473.0% better value on MSRP (29.7 vs 5.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

C-60 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

C-60 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-60

The C-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,483 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the C-60 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-60 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the C-60 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The C-60 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the C-60 scores 1,483 against the Core 2 Duo SU7300's 1,496 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo SU7300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-60 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300.

Feature	C-60	Core 2 Duo SU7300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz+2%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+16967%	3 MB
Process	40 nm-11%	45 nm
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,483	1,496
Geekbench 6 Single	—	188
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	338

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-60 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo SU7300 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-60) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo SU7300). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-60) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) — the C-60 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-60) and GS45,GM45 (Core 2 Duo SU7300).

Feature	C-60	Core 2 Duo SU7300
Socket	FT1	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-60) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300). The C-60 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6290), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop.

Feature	C-60	Core 2 Duo SU7300
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6290	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the C-60 was priced at $50, while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 came in at $289. On launch pricing ($50 vs $289), C-60 was $239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the C-60 delivers 29.7 pts/$ vs 5.2 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo SU7300 — making the C-60 the 140.6% better value option.

Feature	C-60	Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP	$50-83%	$289
Performance per Dollar	29.7+471%	5.2
Release Date	2011	2009

Search C-60 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo SU7300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.