C-60 vs Core Duo T2400

CPU

GPU

C-60

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core Duo T2400

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2006

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

C-60 vs Core Duo T2400 Performance Spectrum

C-60

2 / 2

1,483

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Duo T2400

2 / 2

1,488

+0.3%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-60 vs Core Duo T2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-60 vs Core Duo T2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-60

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $244 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 486.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.7 vs 5.1 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6290, while Core Duo T2400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,483 vs 1,488).
❌350% higher power demand at 9W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2400

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 9W, a 7W reduction.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 29.7 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while C-60 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Duo T2400 better than C-60?

Yes. Core Duo T2400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Duo T2400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Duo T2400 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core Duo T2400 comes in 488.0% more expensive on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. C-60 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

C-60 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

C-60 vs Core Duo T2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-60

The C-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,483 points. Launch price was $69.

Core Duo T2400

The Core Duo T2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,488 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the C-60 and Core Duo T2400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-60 versus 1.83 GHz on the Core Duo T2400 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2400 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). The C-60 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Core Duo T2400 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the C-60 scores 1,483 against the Core Duo T2400's 1,488 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Duo T2400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	C-60	Core Duo T2400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	1.83 GHz+38%
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.83 GHz+83%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	40 nm-38%	65 nm
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,483	1,488

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-60 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Duo T2400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-60 versus DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2400 — the C-60 supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (C-60) vs 2 (Core Duo T2400). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-60) vs 16 (Core Duo T2400) — the Core Duo T2400 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-60) and 945GM,945PM (Core Duo T2400).

Feature	C-60	Core Duo T2400
Socket	FT1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+60%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-60) / VT-x (Core Duo T2400). The C-60 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6290), while the Core Duo T2400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Duo T2400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2400 rivals Pentium T2310.

Feature	C-60	Core Duo T2400
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6290	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the C-60 was priced at $50, while the Core Duo T2400 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($50 vs $294), C-60 was $244 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the C-60 delivers 29.7 pts/$ vs 5.1 pts/$ for the Core Duo T2400 — making the C-60 the 141.7% better value option.

Feature	C-60	Core Duo T2400
MSRP	$50-83%	$294
Performance per Dollar	29.7+482%	5.1
Release Date	2011	2006

Search C-60 on Amazon

Search Core Duo T2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.