
C-60

Pentium G860
C-60 vs Pentium G860 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
C-60 vs Pentium G860 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
C-60 vs Pentium G860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
C-60
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $36 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 71.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.7 vs 17.3 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 9W instead of 256W, a 247W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,483 vs 1,485).
Pentium G860
2011Why buy it
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 29.7 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌2744.4% higher power demand at 256W vs 9W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G860 better than C-60?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
C-60 vs Pentium G860 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-60
The C-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,483 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G860
The Pentium G860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
Both the C-60 and Pentium G860 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-60 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G860 — a 77.1% clock advantage for the Pentium G860 (base: 1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The C-60 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium G860 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the C-60 scores 1,483 against the Pentium G860's 1,485 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium G860. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-60 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G860.
| Feature | C-60 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.33 GHz | 3 GHz+126% |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3 GHz+200% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 40 nm | 32 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Ontario (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,483 | 1,485 |
Memory & Platform
The C-60 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G860 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-60 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G860 — the Pentium G860 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G860 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-60) vs 2 (Pentium G860). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-60) vs 16 (Pentium G860) — the Pentium G860 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | C-60 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT1 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 32 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (C-60) / VT-x (Pentium G860). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6290 (C-60) and HD Graphics (Pentium G860) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G860 targets Desktop.
| Feature | C-60 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6290 | HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the C-60 was priced at $50, while the Pentium G860 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($50 vs $86), C-60 was $36 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the C-60 delivers 29.7 pts/$ vs 17.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G860 — making the C-60 the 52.8% better value option.
| Feature | C-60 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-42% | $86 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.7+72% | 17.3 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















